ADVERTISEMENT

Setback For Vodafone Idea As Supreme Court Rejects Telcos' Plea For AGR Dues Recalculation

The decision came against curative pleas filed by Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel and various other telcos against the 2019 top court verdict in the case.

<div class="paragraphs"><p>Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel and various other telcos had filed curative pleas against the 2019 top court verdict in the case. (Source:&nbsp;<a href="https://unsplash.com/@ptrikutam?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash">Pavan Trikutam</a> on <a href="https://unsplash.com/photos/minimalist-photography-of-three-crank-phones-71CjSSB83Wo?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash">Unsplash</a>)</p></div>
Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel and various other telcos had filed curative pleas against the 2019 top court verdict in the case. (Source: Pavan Trikutam on Unsplash)

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected telecom operators' plea seeking a re-computation of their adjusted gross revenues.

Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel and various other telcos had filed curative pleas against the 2019 top court verdict in the case. The telecom operator alleged that there is a grave error in the calculation of AGR dues by the Department of Telecommunications, coupled with an arbitrary penalty imposed on them by the top court.

The curative plea was rejected by a three-judge bench led by the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, and is the final nail in the coffin in as much as any reconsideration of the AGR case is concerned.

Adjusted gross revenue, or AGR, is the basis for a revenue sharing mechanism between the government and the telecom operators.

Under this mechanism, the operators have to pay a certain licensing fee and spectrum usage fee to the Department of Telecommunications. The DoT calculates the fee as a percentage of the AGR. However, the definition of what constitutes AGR has been a pain point since 2005.

Opinion
Vodafone Idea's Stock Outlook Divides Analysts — Citi Vs Goldman Sachs

The telecom operators argued before various judicial forums that the definition should only include their core revenue, while the department argued that the definition should include all revenue, including revenue from non-telecom services.

In October 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that non-core revenue must be included while calculating the AGR, ending a 14-year-long legal battle between mobile operators and the government on the definition of AGR.

The 2019 judgement dealt a crippling blow to the bruised industry that stared at dues and penalties worth thousands of crores. It had increased the liabilities of Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea to more than Rs 90,000 crore.

Soon after, the companies approached the court, seeking more time for payment of their dues. In September 2020, the apex court allowed for the payment of dues over 10 years.

In a separate plea in 2021, the top court dismissed the applications filed by telecom companies that sought permission to approach the DoT on the calculation of the dues in the case, claiming arithmetic errors in the department's calculation of the dues.

In the aftermath of the AGR judgement, the government initially owned a 33% stake in Vodafone Idea, which now stands reduced at 23%. The shares were allocated to the government in lieu of the conversion of interest dues arising from the deferment of adjusted gross revenue and spectrum auction payments.

Opinion
Vodafone Idea, Indus Towers Fall Most After Supreme Court Verdict On AGR Dues