Modi Stocks: CLSA Strategist Says 'Basket Trade' In PSUs To Have Reality Check Soon

Vikash Kumar Jain said the markets adjust after results as Cabinet formation at the Centre and budgetary movements in July take hold of sentiment.

(Source: Envato) 

There has been a "basket trade" happening in the PSU stocks—that make up half of the 54 stocks that CLSA lists as 'Modi stocks'—in the run-up to the general elections, reflecting in higher returns relative to market benchmark, according to the brokerage's strategist Vikash Kumar Jain.

"There's clearly a basket trade happening irrespective of the sector dynamics," Jain told NDTV Profit. Such strategy also played out in the previous elections of 2019 and 2014, when the PSU index rallied to an interim peak in the lead up to polls, but within a couple of weeks after results, cooled off.

He said the markets adjust after results as Cabinet formation at the Centre and budgetary movements in July take hold of sentiment.

"Essentially, there is a reality check, which will make people think that these stocks have moved, at least for the time, a bit ahead of themselves. That's why what we predict is a playbook similar to the last two times and sometime in this month, a kind of an interim top for these 'Modi Stocks' as a basket," Jain said.

The 'Modi stocks' have, on average, rallied by 50% in the past six months, as compared with the Nifty's 14% rise, CLSA said in a note on Wednesday. Despite coming from varied sectors, all of the 27 PSU stocks from the F&O space have beaten the Nifty over the last six months.

CLSA reported that all 27 non-PSU 'Modi stocks', with the exception of five cement companies, have outperformed the Nifty over this period.

Also Read: Election Not Sole Trigger For Market Volatility: Helios Capital CEO

Watch the full conversation here:

Edited excerpts from the interview:

What is the chatter from your large clients around the election? What are you telling them to do pre or post considering election, valuations and more?

Vikash Jain: See, I think an event like that and with the positioning that it has seen, there is obviously some bit of risk management that is required. I mean, none of us, even some of those clients sitting in the UK could not have predicted Brexit.

Similarly, when it comes to trying to predict such events, you know, consensus among the White crowd, with all its ways in which Parliamentary democracies work, there's always that small inkling of doubt that is there.

So, there's obviously a little bit of risk management which might be seen, something which is being seen going into that event in the last few days. Beyond that, I think the crowd in general is pretty convinced of a continuation of a third term. So it's only a little bit at the margin.

Otherwise, I think everybody is invested in seeing that continuation. So that's clearly a base case that, you know, the ruling party comes back with a reasonably strong majority. That's what the base case is. If there is any deviation from that, it will lead to a much bigger move in the markets on either side.

To run the government you need 272 seats. If it's not 300, but 10% plus or 10% minus, will that be a market-moving number or will it be a very short-term impact?

Vikash Jain: Let's try and understand what that number really means, because I think beyond a point it is about getting a bigger majority in the Rajya Sabha.

I mean, an event which gives you confidence happens, number two, an event that gives you confidence that there will be more states which will kind of come under the fray of the ruling party and that basically means better coordination and better overall growth, like there are certain subjects which are clearly state subjects.

There's only so much that the Centre can do about it. So the market looks at everything, eventually filtering down on whether this improves the outlook on growth, or it deteriorates it.

Now, if 303 was the number, from last time the rally that we've seen, which started in early December, post the positive state elections, slowly the buildup was that things are looking that the government is likely to be as strong and stronger than that. That's why that number around 300 is relevant.

Now, if the number is less than that, then the confidence in that thing about Rajya Sabha and getting more states goes down at the margin. So that is how it could flow into maybe at the margin confidence or growth is a little lesser than where we have been.

So, obviously, the most important number is 270 or I would say that clearly is the important number. But nonetheless, if it's going to be my guess, now a lot of this has to be factored in. You know, things are changing by the day.

It's good that the market is going a little light into that event with the kind of moves that we've seen in the market in the last two or three days. But clearly, 300 I would say, is at the margin. Lower or below 300 will be at the margin disappointment.

The two numbers that you're working with are rounded off at 300 and 270. I would say a number less than 300 is going to be at the margin of disappointment. But if it is above 270, then it should still be digested. So that's how I would look at it.

You came out with an interesting note on "Modi stocks". If there is policy continuity, how do you look at the next five years from a winner's perspective? Would there be winners that stand out?

Vikash Jain: I think so. Good that you define the timeframe. My opinion on stocks will be different depending on the timeframe.

The note I wrote about Modi stocks, essentially that's just a catchy terminology to make things simple. Basically, there are these 54 stocks. Half of them, 27 being PSUs, the other half being non-PSU stocks are linked to certain sectors, certain kinds of characteristics, which are generally associated more closely to policies of the government.

Now, the median return on the stocks is 50% in the last six months. Six months again, because this has been the period of election value and the market has gone up by 15%... There are stocks that have doubled. Now, that just tells you that there is a lot of excitement that has got baked into these. Some of these stocks were cheaper, like some PSU stocks much cheaper. So they have kind of gone up, caught up to that value trade and they've gone beyond that.

So from a more near-term perspective, if you were to ask me 6-9-12 months, of course, these stocks, irrespective of the outcome of the elections, will have to, you know, hold back and catch up on breath. So that's how stock markets work. Nothing goes up, you know, linearly every day. They will have their fits and starts and that's something which one should bear in mind.

A lot of the times when they have built in a lot of these positives at the start, there will be a catch up. Now, when I look at the last two elections in 2014 and 2019, there was this similar kind of a trade and the PSU basket or the PSU index can be seen as an easy proxy to capture this kind of election trade, within a couple of weeks or within a few days after election results.

In both of those instances, PSU stocks, kind of as an index had an interim peak. Early June, I think broadly, was the date because election results came out in mid-May, both of those times. So, you know, from that perspective, I think what's also starting to happen is post-election results, you start seeing the ministers. Then, the discussion moves to the Budget, which typically is about six weeks by five to seven weeks after the election results.

So, essentially, there is bit of a reality check. So from that perspective, there are going to be many of those events that will make people think that these stocks have moved, at least for the time being, a bit ahead of themselves.

That's why what we predict is a playbook similar to the last two times and sometime in this month, a kind of an interim top for these Modi stocks as a basket. Then you start separating out like right now.

Clearly, I mean, it's remarkable 27 PSU stocks in the F&O basket. All of them have outperformed Nifty. These come from various sectors. So there's clearly a basket trade happening irrespective of the sector dynamics, which have kind of really played out.

We may be in a higher-for-longer interest rate regime at least in the US, if not Europe. How big of an impact could that have on risk-asset valuations, including in emerging markets like India?

Vikash Jain: Firstly, let's try and understand how the market moves during the remaining part of maybe the next six months or so, because six months out we face the US elections.

Now what has been happening is a very remarkable thing that we've seen in the last two months, last one month, particularly. You know, there's no big cool-off in dollar. There are no rate cuts that have happened, but despite that, suddenly, currency proxies like gold, silver, have kind of gone you know, taken to the races. That's something which is telling you one very interesting thing, that in this pre-election period, the market is uncertain.

If the Fed will do the right thing, which is required based on the fundamentals of inflation and every other thing, because there is a debate that whether the Fed will be pressured to still cut rates, despite the fact that inflation is not fully under control because of it being maybe politically inclined, or at the same point of time, Trump generally being a proponent of lower rates. What happens if he kind of comes in? So those are certain things which we should also bear in mind.

For now, for this calendar year, I think there are certain commentators who kind of also say that if there is no rate cut in the next meeting then it'd be far too close to elections to make it look like a non-political rate cut. So you know, there are all kinds of arguments that typically happen during the elections, as you can imagine what's been happening closer home, with our elections. So that is what makes the outlook on yields.

That is why this traditional trade of commodities, dollar and yields have not really coincided like they would typically. So that's something that we should bear in mind.

Nonetheless, from our perspective of Indian stock markets, higher for longer, more than that, six rate cuts is what we started the year with. In terms of the US Fed, that's down to practically 1-1.25% rate cuts in this calendar year now.

I think when I was checking today they were talking about a 30 bps rate cut in this calendar. That's like 1.25% or less than that. Now, if that is the case, then clearly what I expected should have happened, has happened in the US market but not in our market, which is banks in the US have outperformed, like Dow Jones Banks Index is 10 percentage point outperformer over Dow Jones, as compared to our market where private banks have underperformed Nifty by 7-8 percentage points.

So in a way, if you had those election stocks or Modi stocks, you would have outperformed. So we've been very focused on that trade. I think what will start happening once this election news is behind us. You will start getting more closely linked to the global macros and whatever's happening, because even we don't see any big talk of rate cut immediately by RBI, if the US Fed doesn't cut.

So, essentially, that should ideally be at the margin positive for banks. Our private banks, which are now one of the very few sectors which are very attractively priced, if you genuinely believe in the longer term growth story of India, I think that's where they should get a little bit of legs. Once the election news is behind us, we kind of get into a more fundamental way of trading stocks.

Does that have to do with foreign money also coming back? Globally, FIIs kind of shunned India, may be in line with some other emerging markets as well. Does India make a comeback along with the EM basket, or would there be idiosyncratic flows that could come to India after election?

Vikash Jain: I think you're absolutely right on the colour of money, because typically the crowd that has generally moved private banks up has been the foreign money. With them turning sellers after the big inflow in December, it's kind of not helping these stocks. What will they do? If you think about it, the call for them was a little obvious.

When China started working for the last 2-3 months, many of them had gone underweight and there was this big event in India which they did not maybe want to take a clear chance on, which was elections.

So, over the last two months, selling and moving into other markets was a little bit easier. Now what happens after the election outcome gives them stability and more predictability for five years, at least at the margin, one factor will be better. But finally, you know it also depends on how much legs the Chinese market has, like we saw in December. Starting November, December 2022 till March 2023, when China went up, India was actually underperforming because a lot of them have moved out of China and now when you know, they have to chase performance to an extent, so I think the other bit is out of our hand.

But with the election thing, if it gets settled in a positive, stable way, at least that factor should be at the margin positive to invite foreign money back.

Are you constructive from now on, until the end of the year, if this event passes by with no major disruptions?

Vikash Jain: Well, I think this is something which we've had an opinion on right from the start of the year. This is likely to be a low-return year at best, because the starting point is very inflated valuations.

The last six months because of this election event you've kind of shunned that valuation, but suddenly when things kind of come back and you take a fresh look at things, it is unlikely to be a big runaway rally unless there is a global runaway that we are part of, from an India perspective.

So I would say that, given the strong performance that we've had over the last six months there could be a bit more, a longer period of consolidation is what my guess is.   

Watch LIVE TV , Get Stock Market Updates, Top Business , IPO and Latest News on NDTV Profit.
GET REGULAR UPDATES