Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement
This Article is From Mar 10, 2022

U.P. Election 2022: Adityanath’s Biggest Competitor Was Not Akhilesh Yadav

U.P. Election 2022: Adityanath’s Biggest Competitor Was Not Akhilesh Yadav
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, at a news conference in Lucknow, on March 19, 2021. (Photographer: T. Narayan/Bloomberg)

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is confident that after the Bharatiya Janata Party wins 300+ seats, Akhilesh Yadav will be forced to “flee abroad”. Columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar says a near-death experience has convinced him that those forecasting a BJP victory could be “off the mark”.

And some liberals insist on seeing the U.P. elections as a referendum on hate.

I'm one of them but even I don't cling to the hope that if—by some twist in the tale—the BJP loses U.P., the political party will find itself on the back foot, forced to conclude that its policy of divisive Hindutva has reached its sell-by date.

So fully have our deepest and darkest passions been excited that reservoirs of this hate have distributed evenly through society in almost every state. We have seen recently how states far removed from U.P.—but influenced in some degree by it—have become founts of self-sustaining hatred.

The crown of the ‘most-divisive state' has fierce, surprise competition these days. One could argue that Adityanath's biggest challenger is not Akhilesh Yadav—his real competitors are the chief ministers of other BJP-run states.

Assam, Tripura, Madhya Pradesh, and Karnataka are four such examples where the politicians who run these states were seemingly never automatic fundamentalists or Hindu-first bigots. Now, they are forced to catch up to their U.P. colleague who has set the bar of bigotry higher than ever before.

In 2014, Himanta Biswa Sarma, then a Congress politician, called Modi a “terrorist”, said we do not do “Hindu-Muslim” and declared, in reference to the 2002 Gujarat riots, that “blood flows through the water pipes of Gujarat”. By 2021, he was saying India belonged to Hindus and the BJP, to which he defected in 2015, did not need “Miya (or Muslim) votes.”

“I know Shivraj Singh [Chouhan],” Father Maria Stephen, public relations officer of the Madhya Pradesh Catholic Church Association (MPCCA), told Article 14 in February. “He is a soft man and was a very good friend of ours in the past. He used to come on every Christmas and wish us well. But this term, he didn't come.” Stephen was saying this in relation to the increased attacks against Christians in MP.

Once upon a time, Chouhan had no problem hosting iftaar parties and wearing a skull cap to show solidarity on Eid. That attitude prompted 16% of MP's Muslims to vote for the BJP in the 2018 assembly elections. By 2020, he said those who plotted ‘love jihad'—the fanciful notion that Muslims were somehow luring Hindu women into matrimony to convert them to Islam—would be “destroyed”.

Similarly former Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa, who, according to his predecessor Siddaramaiah, publicly celebrated the birth anniversary of Tipu Sultan in 2012, wore a Tipu turban and brandished a replica of his sword, cancelled those celebrations in 2019 and later that year vowed to remove all mention from textbooks of the Muslim ruler who fought the British.

The same politician who announced compensation for Muslim anti-CAA protestors killed in police firing—then hastily rescinded it after censure from Delhi—last week handed over Rs 25 lakh of public money to a Bajrang Dal activist with a criminal record who was murdered in the town of Shivamogga, the reason for the compensation being that his attackers were Muslim.

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search