Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement
This Article is From Jan 14, 2018

Trump-Pakistan Relations: Critical Days Ahead

Trump-Pakistan Relations: Critical Days Ahead
Pakistani students protest against U.S. President Donald Trump in Islamabad, Pakistan, holding a banner reads “long live Pakistan, down with America,” on January 5, 2018. (Photograph: AP/PTI)

The future trajectory of U.S.-Pakistan relations will depend in great part on Washington's next move — and how Islamabad responds.

In the aftermath of a traumatic week for U.S.-Pakistan relations — marked by a threatening, truculent tweet by President Donald Trump and his administration's decision to suspend nearly all security aid to Pakistan — one question looms large: After decades of ups and downs, marked by deep tensions followed by bounce-backs in relations, is this time different? Is the relationship headed for an all-out rupture?

We've Seen This Movie Before

The immediate answer is no, because we've been here before. Washington has suspended aid to Pakistan multiple times in the past. Pakistan survived, and so did the relationship.

For all the talk in recent days of shattered alliances and relations damaged beyond repair, let's be clear: A mere aid freeze won't torpedo the relationship.

Bilateral relations were arguably worse in 2011, when multiple events — the American CIA agent Raymond Davis's killing of two Pakistanis, the unilateral U.S. raid on Osama bin Laden's compound, and an American air attack that accidentally killed two dozen Pakistani border troops — plunged bilateral relations into deep crisis. Pakistan retaliated by closing down NATO supply routes on its soil and ordering many U.S. intelligence operatives out of the country. Today, by contrast, Pakistan hasn't staged any retaliations, and the two sides have continued to engage.

And yet, as bad as things were in 2011, the relationship eventually bounced back.

The Importance Of Next Steps

The future trajectory of U.S.-Pakistan relations will depend in great part on Washington's next move — and how Islamabad responds. If the U.S. walks back its threats to stage punitive acts beyond an aid freeze, then the relationship should fall back into the uneasy coexistence that's long marked bilateral relations.

However, if the U.S. takes unprecedented punitive measures —sanctioning Pakistani military officials with ties to terror; revoking Pakistan's non-NATO ally status; increasing drone strikes outside Pakistan's tribal areas; designating Pakistan as a state sponsor of terror; inducing international financial institutions to suspend loans to Pakistan — tensions could skyrocket. The latter measure could prove particularly devastating, given the fragility of Pakistan's economy — and given its urgent need for cash to pay back the large-scale loans flowing into Pakistan to finance the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Also Read: Trump Serves Pakistan Notice, Enter China?

In response to such harsh measures, a chastened Pakistan might ease up on its ties to the terrorists on its soil that target Americans in Afghanistan. More likely, however, the Pakistanis would retaliate — perhaps by shutting down the supply lines and suspending intelligence cooperation with Washington.

These measures could complicate America's already-challenging war effort in Afghanistan and undercut U.S. counter-terrorism activities in the broader Afghanistan-Pakistan region. 

Managing Risks, Objectives, and Interests

Washington's next steps, and Islamabad's responses, will depend on calculations of risks, objectives, and interests. The U.S. government will need to decide how far it is willing to go to pursue its core objective — eliminating terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan that help fuel the insurgency in Afghanistan — knowing full well that implementing harsher measures could jeopardise U.S. interests and goals.

For Pakistan, the question is how much risk it is willing to tolerate by maintaining a policy that helps serve its interests — supporting Afghanistan-focused militants, which are anti-Indian, helps push back against India's presence in that country — but that is also increasingly likely to trigger harsh U.S. measures.

The operative question is this: What conditions must be in place for Pakistan to conclude that the costs of providing sanctuaries — and other types of support — to militants have become prohibitively high?

Also Read: What Do U.S.-Pakistan Tensions Mean For India?

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search